( 4) In my opinion, using the carb cycling diet provides weight-loss and muscle-building benefits while stimulating important metabolic and digestive functions. A high-fat, low-carb ketogenic diet can help people with type 2 diabetes lose weight and lower or cut out the amount of diabetes meds they need.The country also notes this high-fat, low-carb (including sugar) diet is beneficial for weight loss. The Swedish government actually backs a high-fat, low-carb diet for type 2 diabetes thanks to its low requirement for insulin.The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is 20 percent higher in countries with greater availability of high-fructose corn syrup, a manmade type of sugar.Here’s some of what we do know when it comes to sugar and diabetes: (Take wild-caught salmon nutrition, for example.) On the flip side, we know that certain animal foods are loaded with healthy, anti-inflammatory compounds. And there are boatloads of studies linking excess sugar and refined carbohydrates to inflammation and type 2 diabetes. The truth: Inflammation is the root of most diseases. What that means is the sugar that is naturally from the foods that you’re eating can’t get into the cells where it belongs. You can look into the muscle cells of the human body and you find they’re building up tiny particles of fat that’s building insulin resistance. I’m talking about a typical meat-based, animal-based diet. The cause of diabetes is a diet that builds up the amount of fat in the blood. “Diabetes is not and was never caused by eating a high-carbohydrate diet and it’s not caused by eating sugar. And in the opening minutes of the film, many of them, including Neal Barnard, M.D., founder of the Physicians Committee for Responsibility, a vegan-promoting nonprofit, suggests meat and animal products cause type 2 diabetes, not carbs and sugar: The experts and doctors in What the Health are pro-vegan, although they aren’t actually introduced that way in the film. What the Health Claim: Sugar doesn’t cause diabetes meat does. Some of the studies cited actually conclude the opposite of what is claimed. Instead, WTH presents a great deal of weak epidemiological data, case studies on one or two people or other inconclusive evidence. The film does not cite a single rigorous randomized controlled trial on humans supporting its arguments. In her What the Health review, she found that about 96 percent of the data fail to support the film’s claims. Investigative journalist Nina Teicholz, author of “The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet,” performed an analysis of the 37 health claims made in the film. (The filmmakers even seem pro-sugar at some parts… no kidding.) I’m not debating the fact that there are benefits of a vega n diet, but there are drawbacks, too, including some vegan foods I’d never eat. ![]() While it’s not completely evident in the first few minutes, What the Health is actually a pro-vegan film that tends to skew studies and figures to make a point. In this What the Health review, I’ll offer my own take and outline the major hits and misses of the film. That’s one of my main issues with the What the Health documentary streaming on Netflix. We all have unique biologies - what fuels one person could leave another feeling lousy. I never like a one-size-fits-all approach when it comes to nutrition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |